WebSA 37 (CC). The contributions made by Froneman J in these cases are discussed in relation to three substantive themes: his development of the public-law claim of unconscionable conduct (a rival to administrative-law claims); his novel treatment of WebIn the case of s 4 the PAJA is innovative, making provision for forms of public participation that were hardly dreamt of before 1994. However, the PAJA is less generous when it comes to the application of procedural fairness in terms of ss 3 and 4. As far as s 4 is concerned, the use of its innovative provisions may be merely voluntary.
The contribution of the Joseph case to the development of
WebJan 12, 2016 · 14.11 ‘Procedural fairness’ means acting fairly in administrative decision making. It relates to the fairness of the procedure by which a decision is made, and not … WebOct 3, 2024 · All’s fair in love and war – but not in employment law. We are all familiar with the concept of fairness in employment law. For a dismissal to be a fair, an employer must … otranto battle
A fl exible approach to procedural fairness in public administration
WebTOPIC 6: PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS GROUNDS OF REVIEW. Lecturer: Dr K. Moyo. Weeks 12 & 13 (17, 18, 24 May 2024) Explain the requirements of procedural fairness in respect of administrative action impacting on the public. Explain the test for bias as provided in PAJA. TOPIC 7: JUDICIAL PROCEDURES AND JUDICIAL … WebOct 1, 2024 · This article examines when a court should consider ordering the payment of compensation as a remedy for unlawful administrative action in terms of PAJA. First, it … WebProcedural fairness - Section 6 (2)(c) We have already looked at procedural fairness in detail when we looked at the requirements of Sections 3 and 4 of the PAJA. Failure to follow fair … otranto channel